STEER / README.md
narunraman's picture
Update README.md
2ab9832 verified
|
Raw History Blame Contribute Delete
24.3 kB
metadata
pretty_name: STEER
license: cc-by-4.0
language:
  - en
task_categories:
  - multiple-choice
  - question-answering
tags:
  - economics
  - rationality
  - decision-making
  - game-theory
  - social-choice
  - reasoning
  - benchmark
size_categories:
  - 10K<n<100K
configs:
  - config_name: default
    default: true
    data_files:
      - split: test
        path: data/*/test.parquet
      - split: few_shot
        path: data/*/few_shot.parquet
  - config_name: add_sub
    data_files:
      - split: test
        path: data/add_sub/test.parquet
      - split: few_shot
        path: data/add_sub/few_shot.parquet
  - config_name: mult_div
    data_files:
      - split: test
        path: data/mult_div/test.parquet
      - split: few_shot
        path: data/mult_div/few_shot.parquet
  - config_name: compute_expectations
    data_files:
      - split: test
        path: data/compute_expectations/test.parquet
      - split: few_shot
        path: data/compute_expectations/few_shot.parquet
  - config_name: micro_utility
    data_files:
      - split: test
        path: data/micro_utility/test.parquet
      - split: few_shot
        path: data/micro_utility/few_shot.parquet
  - config_name: optimize_continuous
    data_files:
      - split: test
        path: data/optimize_continuous/test.parquet
      - split: few_shot
        path: data/optimize_continuous/few_shot.parquet
  - config_name: constrained_optimization
    data_files:
      - split: test
        path: data/constrained_optimization/test.parquet
      - split: few_shot
        path: data/constrained_optimization/few_shot.parquet
  - config_name: prob_basic
    data_files:
      - split: test
        path: data/prob_basic/test.parquet
      - split: few_shot
        path: data/prob_basic/few_shot.parquet
  - config_name: complement_rule
    data_files:
      - split: test
        path: data/complement_rule/test.parquet
      - split: few_shot
        path: data/complement_rule/few_shot.parquet
  - config_name: bayes_rule
    data_files:
      - split: test
        path: data/bayes_rule/test.parquet
      - split: few_shot
        path: data/bayes_rule/few_shot.parquet
  - config_name: categorical_syllogism
    data_files:
      - split: test
        path: data/categorical_syllogism/test.parquet
      - split: few_shot
        path: data/categorical_syllogism/few_shot.parquet
  - config_name: conditional_syllogism
    data_files:
      - split: test
        path: data/conditional_syllogism/test.parquet
      - split: few_shot
        path: data/conditional_syllogism/few_shot.parquet
  - config_name: equiv_contrapositive
    data_files:
      - split: test
        path: data/equiv_contrapositive/test.parquet
      - split: few_shot
        path: data/equiv_contrapositive/few_shot.parquet
  - config_name: first_order_false_belief
    data_files:
      - split: test
        path: data/first_order_false_belief/test.parquet
      - split: few_shot
        path: data/first_order_false_belief/few_shot.parquet
  - config_name: second_order_false_belief
    data_files:
      - split: test
        path: data/second_order_false_belief/test.parquet
      - split: few_shot
        path: data/second_order_false_belief/few_shot.parquet
  - config_name: completeness
    data_files:
      - split: test
        path: data/completeness/test.parquet
      - split: few_shot
        path: data/completeness/few_shot.parquet
  - config_name: transitivity
    data_files:
      - split: test
        path: data/transitivity/test.parquet
      - split: few_shot
        path: data/transitivity/few_shot.parquet
  - config_name: independence
    data_files:
      - split: test
        path: data/independence/test.parquet
      - split: few_shot
        path: data/independence/few_shot.parquet
  - config_name: sunk_cost
    data_files:
      - split: test
        path: data/sunk_cost/test.parquet
      - split: few_shot
        path: data/sunk_cost/few_shot.parquet
  - config_name: endowment_effect
    data_files:
      - split: test
        path: data/endowment_effect/test.parquet
      - split: few_shot
        path: data/endowment_effect/few_shot.parquet
  - config_name: time_inconsistency
    data_files:
      - split: test
        path: data/time_inconsistency/test.parquet
      - split: few_shot
        path: data/time_inconsistency/few_shot.parquet
  - config_name: completeness_risk
    data_files:
      - split: test
        path: data/completeness_risk/test.parquet
      - split: few_shot
        path: data/completeness_risk/few_shot.parquet
  - config_name: transitivity_risk
    data_files:
      - split: test
        path: data/transitivity_risk/test.parquet
      - split: few_shot
        path: data/transitivity_risk/few_shot.parquet
  - config_name: independence_risk
    data_files:
      - split: test
        path: data/independence_risk/test.parquet
      - split: few_shot
        path: data/independence_risk/few_shot.parquet
  - config_name: compute_expected_utility
    data_files:
      - split: test
        path: data/compute_expected_utility/test.parquet
      - split: few_shot
        path: data/compute_expected_utility/few_shot.parquet
  - config_name: maximize_expected_utility
    data_files:
      - split: test
        path: data/maximize_expected_utility/test.parquet
      - split: few_shot
        path: data/maximize_expected_utility/few_shot.parquet
  - config_name: loss_aversion
    data_files:
      - split: test
        path: data/loss_aversion/test.parquet
      - split: few_shot
        path: data/loss_aversion/few_shot.parquet
  - config_name: gamblers_fallacy
    data_files:
      - split: test
        path: data/gamblers_fallacy/test.parquet
      - split: few_shot
        path: data/gamblers_fallacy/few_shot.parquet
  - config_name: certainty_effect
    data_files:
      - split: test
        path: data/certainty_effect/test.parquet
      - split: few_shot
        path: data/certainty_effect/few_shot.parquet
  - config_name: reflection_effect
    data_files:
      - split: test
        path: data/reflection_effect/test.parquet
      - split: few_shot
        path: data/reflection_effect/few_shot.parquet
  - config_name: ambiguity_aversion
    data_files:
      - split: test
        path: data/ambiguity_aversion/test.parquet
      - split: few_shot
        path: data/ambiguity_aversion/few_shot.parquet
  - config_name: interpret_games
    data_files:
      - split: test
        path: data/interpret_games/test.parquet
      - split: few_shot
        path: data/interpret_games/few_shot.parquet
  - config_name: best_response
    data_files:
      - split: test
        path: data/best_response/test.parquet
  - config_name: dominant_strategies
    data_files:
      - split: test
        path: data/dominant_strategies/test.parquet
      - split: few_shot
        path: data/dominant_strategies/few_shot.parquet
  - config_name: dominated_strategies
    data_files:
      - split: test
        path: data/dominated_strategies/test.parquet
      - split: few_shot
        path: data/dominated_strategies/few_shot.parquet
  - config_name: iterated_removal
    data_files:
      - split: test
        path: data/iterated_removal/test.parquet
  - config_name: pure_nash
    data_files:
      - split: test
        path: data/pure_nash/test.parquet
      - split: few_shot
        path: data/pure_nash/few_shot.parquet
  - config_name: backward_induction
    data_files:
      - split: test
        path: data/backward_induction/test.parquet
      - split: few_shot
        path: data/backward_induction/few_shot.parquet
  - config_name: subgame_nash
    data_files:
      - split: test
        path: data/subgame_nash/test.parquet
      - split: few_shot
        path: data/subgame_nash/few_shot.parquet
  - config_name: feasibility
    data_files:
      - split: test
        path: data/feasibility/test.parquet
      - split: few_shot
        path: data/feasibility/few_shot.parquet
  - config_name: enforceability
    data_files:
      - split: test
        path: data/enforceability/test.parquet
      - split: few_shot
        path: data/enforceability/few_shot.parquet
  - config_name: trigger
    data_files:
      - split: test
        path: data/trigger/test.parquet
      - split: few_shot
        path: data/trigger/few_shot.parquet
  - config_name: bayes_nash
    data_files:
      - split: test
        path: data/bayes_nash/test.parquet
      - split: few_shot
        path: data/bayes_nash/few_shot.parquet
  - config_name: pareto_sc
    data_files:
      - split: test
        path: data/pareto_sc/test.parquet
      - split: few_shot
        path: data/pareto_sc/few_shot.parquet
  - config_name: sc_monotonicity_rules
    data_files:
      - split: test
        path: data/sc_monotonicity_rules/test.parquet
      - split: few_shot
        path: data/sc_monotonicity_rules/few_shot.parquet
  - config_name: sc_transitivity_rules
    data_files:
      - split: test
        path: data/sc_transitivity_rules/test.parquet
      - split: few_shot
        path: data/sc_transitivity_rules/few_shot.parquet
  - config_name: sc_nondictatorship
    data_files:
      - split: test
        path: data/sc_nondictatorship/test.parquet
      - split: few_shot
        path: data/sc_nondictatorship/few_shot.parquet
  - config_name: plurality_voting
    data_files:
      - split: test
        path: data/plurality_voting/test.parquet
      - split: few_shot
        path: data/plurality_voting/few_shot.parquet
  - config_name: borda_count
    data_files:
      - split: test
        path: data/borda_count/test.parquet
      - split: few_shot
        path: data/borda_count/few_shot.parquet
  - config_name: copeland_method
    data_files:
      - split: test
        path: data/copeland_method/test.parquet
      - split: few_shot
        path: data/copeland_method/few_shot.parquet
  - config_name: fair_division
    data_files:
      - split: test
        path: data/fair_division/test.parquet
      - split: few_shot
        path: data/fair_division/few_shot.parquet
  - config_name: condorcet_criterion
    data_files:
      - split: test
        path: data/condorcet_criterion/test.parquet
      - split: few_shot
        path: data/condorcet_criterion/few_shot.parquet
  - config_name: dsic_mechanism
    data_files:
      - split: test
        path: data/dsic_mechanism/test.parquet
      - split: few_shot
        path: data/dsic_mechanism/few_shot.parquet
  - config_name: bic_mechanism
    data_files:
      - split: test
        path: data/bic_mechanism/test.parquet
      - split: few_shot
        path: data/bic_mechanism/few_shot.parquet
  - config_name: ir_mechanism
    data_files:
      - split: test
        path: data/ir_mechanism/test.parquet
      - split: few_shot
        path: data/ir_mechanism/few_shot.parquet
  - config_name: budget_balance
    data_files:
      - split: test
        path: data/budget_balance/test.parquet
      - split: few_shot
        path: data/budget_balance/few_shot.parquet
  - config_name: top_trading
    data_files:
      - split: test
        path: data/top_trading/test.parquet
      - split: few_shot
        path: data/top_trading/few_shot.parquet
  - config_name: auctions_risk
    data_files:
      - split: test
        path: data/auctions_risk/test.parquet
      - split: few_shot
        path: data/auctions_risk/few_shot.parquet
  - config_name: auctions_affiliated
    data_files:
      - split: test
        path: data/auctions_affiliated/test.parquet
      - split: few_shot
        path: data/auctions_affiliated/few_shot.parquet

STEER

STEER measures how well large language models reason about economic decisions, from arithmetic and probability through single-agent choice under certainty and risk, strategic reasoning in games, and decisions made on behalf of others (social choice and mechanism design). Each element of the paper's taxonomy is one skill, for example applying Bayes' rule or finding a pure-strategy Nash equilibrium; some elements test for behavioural biases (certainty effect, sunk cost, endowment effect) by checking that related answers are consistent.

The companion benchmark STEER-ME is narunraman/steer_me.

Contents

58 elements; test has 16,300 questions (20,735 rows), few_shot 705 questions (805 rows). A row is one question part: most questions have one part; consistency-graded questions have several.

Loading

from datasets import load_dataset

ds = load_dataset("narunraman/steer", "add_sub")   # one element: splits test and few_shot
everything = load_dataset("narunraman/steer")          # all elements (config "default")

There is one config per element, named after the element, and a default config with all of them. Every row carries its setting and module, so a setting or module is a filter: everything["test"].filter(lambda r: r["module"] == "...").

How the questions are generated

Each element has a set of question templates written for it, which vary the question type, the domain (subject matter of the story), the difficulty and, where relevant, the perspective (first person, a named third person, ...). A filler program for the element draws the numbers or other content for a template, computes the correct option, and builds the distractors from typical mistakes; options are then shuffled (unless an option refers to others by position, such as 'none of the above'). Every question is determined by element, template_id and seed, so it can be regenerated. This release was generated by autosteer@0.1.0+4bf3f71; ELEMENTS.md describes each element's templates, answer key and distractors.

Sample size: a cell is one combination of type, domain and difficulty within an element. Each cell has 20 test questions, and every element has at least 200 (when there are fewer than 10 cells, the floor is spread evenly over them). Questions that fail automatic checks (no or several correct options, duplicate options, unfilled placeholders) or repeat an earlier question are discarded and redrawn.

Splits

  • test: the benchmark.
  • few_shot: 5 questions per question type of each element, for use as in-context examples. They come from templates that are never used for test: the element's own example templates where it has them, otherwise templates held out of test (only templates whose removal leaves every test cell covered). No few_shot question or template text occurs in test, and no few_shot template has the text of a template used for test. 2 elements have no few_shot split because each of their templates is the only one of some test cell: best_response, iterated_removal.

Fields

field type meaning
element string element id; also the config name
question_id string <element>/<base_id>/<part>, unique in the dataset
base_id string one question (16 hex digits of a content hash); shared by its parts
part int32 0-based part index within base_id; most questions have one part
template_id string <element>/<pool>/<n>: the template the question was filled from
question_text string the prompt
options list answer options in presentation order, without letter labels
grading string answer or consistency
correct_index int32 0-based index of the correct option; null for consistency-graded rows
consistency_group string rows scored together (<element>/<base_id>); null for answer-graded rows
consistency_rule string <rule_id>:<allowed>; null for answer-graded rows
type string question type within the element (default if the element has one)
domain string subject matter of the wording (e.g. consumer_goods)
perspective string first_person, second_person, anon, man, woman, ai_assistant; null if none
tags list other template descriptors (may be empty)
difficulty int32 difficulty level within the element: 1 is its easiest, up to its number of levels; not comparable across elements
setting string setting of the taxonomy
module string module of the taxonomy
generator string autosteer@<version>+<commit> that generated the row
seed int64 with element and template_id, regenerates the question

difficulty is relative to the element: its levels are numbered from 1 (the element's easiest) up to its number of levels, and many elements have a single level. Levels can be compared within an element, not across elements.

Grading

Answer-graded rows (grading == "answer") have one correct option, options[correct_index]. The score of an element is accuracy over its questions; a model's answer is the index of the option it chooses.

Consistency-graded rows (grading == "consistency") have no correct option. They test for a behavioural bias: the parts of one question (rows with the same consistency_group) are presented separately, and the choices count as consistent if the tuple of chosen option indices, in part order, is one of the allowed tuples listed in consistency_rule (<rule_id>:<allowed>, tuples written as digit strings separated by commas). The score is the share of consistent groups.

def consistent(choices, rule):  # choices: chosen option index per part, in part order
    allowed = rule.split(":", 1)[1].split(",")
    return "".join(map(str, choices)) in allowed

Example: same_brand:02,11 means choosing option 0 in part 0 and option 2 in part 1, or option 1 in both, is consistent.

pairwise_complete (completeness, completeness_risk) is the exception: its comma-separated tokens are not allowed tuples but one token per part, in part order, of six digits abpqic: the part compares alternatives a and b (0-based, in the order the question describes them), and p, q, i, c are the option indices of "prefer a", "prefer b", "indifferent" and "cannot decide". The group is consistent (complete) if no part's choice is its c; the transitivity of the answered pairs is a secondary measure (autosteer.release.consistency.score_transitivity).

The rules:

rule elements consistent when
common_ratio_same_side certainty_effect (type two_part) the sure option and its scaled-down version, or the lottery in both parts.
ellsberg_seu ambiguity_aversion the pairs that one subjective probability can explain (the known-odds bet in exactly one part, or indifferent in both).
mirror_trade endowment_effect Yes in exactly one part, or indifferent in both.
pairwise_complete completeness, completeness_risk no pair answered "cannot decide" (the answers are complete). Reported besides: whether the answered pairs are transitive.
reflection_same_side reflection_effect (type two_part) the same side in both parts.
same_brand independence the same brand in both parts, or no preference in both.

In type stated_prior the question states which option the reader chose in an earlier, related choice; the keyed option is the one on the same side.

Elements

Per setting, in paper order. ELEMENTS.md has the full description of every element (how its questions are generated, what varies, how the answer and distractors are computed, how it is graded); elements.csv and elements.jsonl have the same information for programs.

Foundations

id config element grading test questions
1.1.a add_sub Addition and Subtraction answer 200
1.1.b mult_div Multiplication and Division answer 240
1.1.c compute_expectations Compute Expectations answer 200
1.2.a micro_utility Optimize over a Discrete Set answer 200
1.2.b optimize_continuous Optimize a Continuous Function answer 200
1.2.c constrained_optimization Constrained Optimization answer 240
1.3.a prob_basic Compute Probabilities of Outcomes answer 280
1.3.b complement_rule Complement Rule answer 200
1.3.c bayes_rule Bayes' Rule answer 200
1.4.a categorical_syllogism Categorical Syllogism answer 200
1.4.b conditional_syllogism Conditional Syllogism answer 640
1.4.c equiv_contrapositive Logical Equivalence of Contrapositive answer 200
1.5.a first_order_false_belief First-Order False Belief answer 320
1.5.b second_order_false_belief Second-Order False Belief answer 320

Decisions in Single-Agent Environments

id config element grading test questions
2.1.a completeness Completeness consistency 240
2.1.b transitivity Transitivity answer 200
2.1.c independence Independence consistency 200
2.2.a sunk_cost Avoidance of the Sunk Cost Fallacy answer 320
2.2.b endowment_effect Avoidance of the Endowment Effect consistency 200
2.2.c time_inconsistency Avoidance of Time Inconsistency answer 200
2.3.a completeness_risk Completeness over Lotteries consistency 240
2.3.b transitivity_risk Transitivity over Lotteries answer 200
2.3.c independence_risk Independence over Lotteries answer 200
2.4.a compute_expected_utility Compute Expected Utility answer 200
2.4.b maximize_expected_utility Maximize Expected Utility answer 200
2.4.e loss_aversion Avoidance of Loss Averse Behavior answer 200
2.5.a gamblers_fallacy Avoidance of the Gambler's Fallacy answer 200
2.5.b certainty_effect Avoidance of the Certainty Effect mixed 200
2.5.c reflection_effect Avoidance of the Reflection Effect mixed 200
2.5.d ambiguity_aversion Avoidance of Ambiguity Aversion consistency 200

Decisions in Multi-Agent Environments

id config element grading test questions
3.1.a interpret_games Interpret Games answer 200
3.1.b best_response Best Response answer 200
3.1.c dominant_strategies Dominant Strategies answer 200
3.1.d dominated_strategies Avoidance of Dominated Strategies answer 200
3.1.e iterated_removal Iterated Removal of Dominated Strategies answer 240
3.1.f pure_nash Pure Nash Equilibrium answer 200
3.2.a backward_induction Backward Induction answer 200
3.2.b subgame_nash Subgame-Perfect Nash Equilibrium answer 480
3.4.a feasibility Feasibility in Infinitely Repeated Games answer 240
3.4.b enforceability Enforceability in Infinitely Repeated Games answer 200
3.4.c trigger Trigger Strategies answer 200
3.5.a bayes_nash Bayes-Nash Equilibrium answer 200

Decisions on Behalf of Other Agents

id config element grading test questions
4.1.a pareto_sc Pareto Efficiency in Social Welfare Functions answer 240
4.1.b sc_monotonicity_rules Monotonicity in Social Welfare Functions answer 240
4.1.c sc_transitivity_rules Transitivity in Social Welfare Functions answer 240
4.1.d sc_nondictatorship Non-Dictatorial Social Welfare Function answer 360
4.2.a plurality_voting Plurality Vote answer 200
4.2.b borda_count Borda Count answer 200
4.2.c copeland_method Copeland's Method answer 480
4.2.d fair_division Fair Division Algorithms answer 200
condorcet_criterion Condorcet Winner answer 200
4.3.a dsic_mechanism Dominant Strategy Incentive Compatibility answer 380
4.3.b bic_mechanism Bayesian Incentive Compatibility answer 800
4.3.c ir_mechanism Individual Rationality answer 640
4.3.d budget_balance Budget Balanced answer 480
4.4.a top_trading Top Trading Cycles answer 400
4.4.b auctions_risk Optimal Auction for Bidders with Differing Risk Attitudes answer 480
4.4.c auctions_affiliated Optimal Auction for Bidders with Affiliated Values answer 960

License

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). You may share and adapt the data with attribution; please cite the paper below.

Citation

@inproceedings{ramansteer,
  author    = {Narun Krishnamurthi Raman and Taylor Lundy and
               Samuel Joseph Amouyal and Yoav Levine and
               Kevin Leyton{-}Brown and Moshe Tennenholtz},
  title     = {{STEER:} {A}ssessing the {E}conomic {R}ationality of
               {L}arge {L}anguage {M}odels},
  booktitle = {Forty-first International Conference on Machine Learning,
               {ICML} 2024, Vienna, Austria, July 21-27, 2024},
  publisher = {OpenReview.net},
  year      = {2024},
  url       = {https://openreview.net/forum?id=nU1mtFDtMX}
}