inflatebot/compinf-qwen-image-2.1
Updated
Bot PRO
inflatebot
P(doom) Rejects the premise
AI & ML interests
"Potentially one of my biggest flaws is that I genuinely think that the science appreciates when you commit to a bit." - Tom ExtractionsAndIre
Recent Activity
new activity about 6 hours ago
inflatebot/MN-12B-Mag-Mell-R1:Permission to use Mag Mell in a free game (donations + Patreon early access) new activity about 20 hours ago
inflatebot/anima-is-fine-actually:lmao updated a model 2 days ago
inflatebot/compinf-qwen-image-2.1Organizations
Permission to use Mag Mell in a free game (donations + Patreon early access)
❤️ 1
5
#21 opened 1 day ago
by 
grognar
lmao
3
#2 opened 2 days ago
by 
ItzPingCat
updated a
model 2 days ago
published a
model 2 days ago
reacted to AtAndDev's post with 😔👍 2 days ago
Post
4931
@Banaxi-Tech stop hiding my comments. AND STOP STEALING PAPERS AND SPREADING MISINFORMATION.
your BGA blog is a copy of NSA (deepseek, 2025) branded under your name. literally the same top16 selected blocks, 512 local window, router over block summaries, all you did was change block size from 64 to 128.
you didnt cite NSA once but you put a “please cite BGA” bibtex at the bottom.
i commented under your post and said that there is no way that you can support claims like: “The Accuracy Should BE WAy better than DSA but untested yet.” you didnt run a single experiment. and the 256x isnt from BGA, its just n/2k with k=2048 so the exact same k DSA uses. if opus wrote this for you, at least read it before posting.
i commented again after you hid my comment despite it having constructive and correct feedback and you hid that too. and again.
you can hide the truth and just try to get hf post likes..... but is it really the thing that needs to be done? do you really want to take papers and make them yours while barely even changing the params?
admitting your mistakes and doing something about them needs humbleness, intelligence, humanness.
i encourage you to admit your mistakes and try to do better next time (at least read what blog your ai wrote or do proper experiments to back your stuff up).
your BGA blog is a copy of NSA (deepseek, 2025) branded under your name. literally the same top16 selected blocks, 512 local window, router over block summaries, all you did was change block size from 64 to 128.
you didnt cite NSA once but you put a “please cite BGA” bibtex at the bottom.
i commented under your post and said that there is no way that you can support claims like: “The Accuracy Should BE WAy better than DSA but untested yet.” you didnt run a single experiment. and the 256x isnt from BGA, its just n/2k with k=2048 so the exact same k DSA uses. if opus wrote this for you, at least read it before posting.
i commented again after you hid my comment despite it having constructive and correct feedback and you hid that too. and again.
you can hide the truth and just try to get hf post likes..... but is it really the thing that needs to be done? do you really want to take papers and make them yours while barely even changing the params?
admitting your mistakes and doing something about them needs humbleness, intelligence, humanness.
i encourage you to admit your mistakes and try to do better next time (at least read what blog your ai wrote or do proper experiments to back your stuff up).
- 49 replies
liked 2
models 10 days ago
liked a
model 13 days ago
liked 2
models 18 days ago
liked a
model 29 days ago
replied to their post about 1 month ago
Nothing I'm just remarking on the rather poor quality of the public posts feed :P
Don't take me too seriously I'm just saying words recreationally
replied to their post about 1 month ago
Be nice if they disallowed glazing ridiculous slop that nobody cares about too, but at least we have that!
posted an update about 1 month ago
Post
2779
They really do just let you say whatever on here, huh
- 10 replies
reacted to salma-remyx's post with 🔥 about 2 months ago
Post
2730
If you can’t explain why your AI-generated contribution belongs in the repo, don’t put it in a maintainer’s queue 🙅🏻♀️
Before asking for review, you should be able to answer:
1. What project need does it address?
2. Where does it fit, and does it duplicate existing work?
3. What evidence shows it works, and will you own it through review?
If you can’t answer those, you haven’t saved anyone time. You’ve passed the buck to the maintainer.
Outrider has made us better contributors by doing more of this work before upstream review by
* reading contribution rules, accepted PRs, and open issues
* finding needs and integration points
* drafting the code, tests, and context.
We still decide what deserves to go upstream, verify the claims, coordinate with maintainers and contributors, and stay involved through review.
On huggingface/peft, only 4 of 20 Outrider runs opened draft PRs. Two contributions have now merged:
✅ Riemannian-preconditioned LoRA: https://github.com/huggingface/peft/pull/3382
✅ Super-Tuning: https://github.com/huggingface/peft/pull/3518
We have more contributions in review and far more ideas were filtered out before they reached a maintainer.
Full case study: https://remyx.ai/case-study
Outrider: https://github.com/remyxai/outrider
Before asking for review, you should be able to answer:
1. What project need does it address?
2. Where does it fit, and does it duplicate existing work?
3. What evidence shows it works, and will you own it through review?
If you can’t answer those, you haven’t saved anyone time. You’ve passed the buck to the maintainer.
Outrider has made us better contributors by doing more of this work before upstream review by
* reading contribution rules, accepted PRs, and open issues
* finding needs and integration points
* drafting the code, tests, and context.
We still decide what deserves to go upstream, verify the claims, coordinate with maintainers and contributors, and stay involved through review.
On huggingface/peft, only 4 of 20 Outrider runs opened draft PRs. Two contributions have now merged:
✅ Riemannian-preconditioned LoRA: https://github.com/huggingface/peft/pull/3382
✅ Super-Tuning: https://github.com/huggingface/peft/pull/3518
We have more contributions in review and far more ideas were filtered out before they reached a maintainer.
Full case study: https://remyx.ai/case-study
Outrider: https://github.com/remyxai/outrider
- 11 replies
What does cwb stand for?
👍 1
6
#2 opened 2 months ago
by 
Jamerrone
Amazing
🚀🤯 3
3
#1 opened about 2 months ago
by 
Jbeard
liked a
model about 2 months ago
