Draft Hugging Face article
Browse files
docs/huggingface-article-draft.md
ADDED
|
@@ -0,0 +1,222 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
+
# Jawbreaker: Private Scam Defense for Someone You Love
|
| 2 |
+
|
| 3 |
+
> Draft for Hugging Face Articles / community post.
|
| 4 |
+
>
|
| 5 |
+
> Status: working draft. Add demo video and final social links before publishing.
|
| 6 |
+
|
| 7 |
+

|
| 8 |
+
|
| 9 |
+
## Short Version
|
| 10 |
+
|
| 11 |
+
Jawbreaker is a small-model scam defense app for people who need a clear answer before they click, reply, share a code, or send money.
|
| 12 |
+
|
| 13 |
+
Paste a suspicious text, email, or DM. Jawbreaker turns it into a simple safety card:
|
| 14 |
+
|
| 15 |
+
- the risk level
|
| 16 |
+
- the warning signs
|
| 17 |
+
- who the sender is pretending to be
|
| 18 |
+
- what they want
|
| 19 |
+
- what could happen
|
| 20 |
+
- the safest next step
|
| 21 |
+
- a copyable note to send to someone you trust
|
| 22 |
+
|
| 23 |
+
Live app: https://huggingface.co/spaces/build-small-hackathon/jawbreaker
|
| 24 |
+
|
| 25 |
+
Model: https://huggingface.co/build-small-hackathon/jawbreaker-minicpm5-1b-lora-v8
|
| 26 |
+
|
| 27 |
+
Dataset/eval bundle: https://huggingface.co/datasets/build-small-hackathon/jawbreaker-scam-defense-data
|
| 28 |
+
|
| 29 |
+
Collection: https://huggingface.co/collections/build-small-hackathon/jawbreaker-6a263632dcd0b6d41ca914ff
|
| 30 |
+
|
| 31 |
+
GitHub: https://github.com/gowtham0992/jawbreaker
|
| 32 |
+
|
| 33 |
+
## Why We Built It
|
| 34 |
+
|
| 35 |
+
Most scam-defense tools explain scams after the fact. Jawbreaker is built for the moment before someone acts.
|
| 36 |
+
|
| 37 |
+
That moment is small but high stakes:
|
| 38 |
+
|
| 39 |
+
- a package fee link
|
| 40 |
+
- a fake bank callback
|
| 41 |
+
- a recruiter promising easy money
|
| 42 |
+
- a "new phone number" from a family member
|
| 43 |
+
- a verification code someone asks you to share
|
| 44 |
+
|
| 45 |
+
The product goal is not to be a general assistant. It is to help someone pause, understand the message, and choose one safe next step.
|
| 46 |
+
|
| 47 |
+
Jawbreaker is intentionally narrow:
|
| 48 |
+
|
| 49 |
+
1. Read one suspicious message.
|
| 50 |
+
2. Identify the scam risk and manipulation pattern.
|
| 51 |
+
3. Explain the warning signs in plain English.
|
| 52 |
+
4. Recommend one safe action.
|
| 53 |
+
5. Help the user ask a trusted person to check it.
|
| 54 |
+
|
| 55 |
+
## The Product Shape
|
| 56 |
+
|
| 57 |
+
The app is designed around a safety card, not a chatbot.
|
| 58 |
+
|
| 59 |
+
The reason is simple: scams use urgency. A chat interface can accidentally invite more back-and-forth. Jawbreaker should reduce decisions, not add more.
|
| 60 |
+
|
| 61 |
+
The current UI shows:
|
| 62 |
+
|
| 63 |
+
- a message input
|
| 64 |
+
- sample messages
|
| 65 |
+
- a verdict card
|
| 66 |
+
- a "Scam DNA" breakdown
|
| 67 |
+
- the safest next step
|
| 68 |
+
- a note that can be copied to someone trusted
|
| 69 |
+
- session-only history of checked messages
|
| 70 |
+
|
| 71 |
+
The app also asks users to remove passwords, account numbers, ID numbers, addresses, and personal codes before pasting. Jawbreaker is a safety aid, not legal, financial, or cybersecurity advice.
|
| 72 |
+
|
| 73 |
+
## The Small Model
|
| 74 |
+
|
| 75 |
+
Jawbreaker uses a fine-tuned MiniCPM model:
|
| 76 |
+
|
| 77 |
+
- Base model: `openbmb/MiniCPM5-1B`
|
| 78 |
+
- Adapter: `build-small-hackathon/jawbreaker-minicpm5-1b-lora-v8`
|
| 79 |
+
- Training: PEFT/LoRA on Modal A100
|
| 80 |
+
- Runtime: Hugging Face ZeroGPU
|
| 81 |
+
- App: Gradio / Gradio Server
|
| 82 |
+
|
| 83 |
+
The 1B model matters. Scam defense is a focused task, so the product does not need a giant general-purpose model. It needs reliable structured output, low false negatives, and safe actions.
|
| 84 |
+
|
| 85 |
+
The model outputs strict JSON for the app renderer. Jawbreaker validates that JSON before rendering the safety card.
|
| 86 |
+
|
| 87 |
+
## Defense in Depth
|
| 88 |
+
|
| 89 |
+
The model is not the only safety layer.
|
| 90 |
+
|
| 91 |
+
Jawbreaker uses a defense-in-depth pipeline:
|
| 92 |
+
|
| 93 |
+
1. The small model generates structured scam analysis.
|
| 94 |
+
2. The app parses the result as JSON.
|
| 95 |
+
3. The schema validator checks required fields.
|
| 96 |
+
4. A deterministic safety guard catches obvious high-risk patterns.
|
| 97 |
+
5. If model output is invalid or weak, the app falls back to a safer deterministic analysis.
|
| 98 |
+
|
| 99 |
+
The app should never tell someone to click a suspicious link or call a number from the suspicious message. Safe actions point to official channels, known numbers, trusted apps, or a trusted person.
|
| 100 |
+
|
| 101 |
+
## Training and Calibration
|
| 102 |
+
|
| 103 |
+
The final adapter is v8.
|
| 104 |
+
|
| 105 |
+
Earlier adapters helped prove that MiniCPM could produce the right JSON shape. Later passes focused on harder decision boundaries:
|
| 106 |
+
|
| 107 |
+
- package phishing
|
| 108 |
+
- bank and payment phishing
|
| 109 |
+
- family impersonation
|
| 110 |
+
- tech support scams
|
| 111 |
+
- fake job/recruiter scams
|
| 112 |
+
- prize and lottery scams
|
| 113 |
+
- wrong-number investment grooming
|
| 114 |
+
- benign family, school, pharmacy, and logistics messages that should not be overcalled
|
| 115 |
+
|
| 116 |
+
The v8 pass was failure-driven. We used eval results to find weak spots, then added targeted synthetic/sanitized calibration data and reran guarded evals.
|
| 117 |
+
|
| 118 |
+
The public dataset/eval bundle includes the training splits, eval files, and reports that support the final model decision.
|
| 119 |
+
|
| 120 |
+
## Final Eval
|
| 121 |
+
|
| 122 |
+
Final guarded Modal A100 eval on the 632-case hard v8 suite:
|
| 123 |
+
|
| 124 |
+
| Metric | Result |
|
| 125 |
+
| --- | ---: |
|
| 126 |
+
| Cases | 632 |
|
| 127 |
+
| Risk accuracy | 579/632, 91.61% |
|
| 128 |
+
| Scam type accuracy | 561/632, 88.77% |
|
| 129 |
+
| Mean tactic recall | 90.69% |
|
| 130 |
+
| Dangerous as safe | 0 |
|
| 131 |
+
| Dangerous as needs_check | 0 |
|
| 132 |
+
| Safe as dangerous or suspicious | 0 |
|
| 133 |
+
| Unsafe action violations | 0 |
|
| 134 |
+
| Invalid predictions | 0 |
|
| 135 |
+
| Model errors | 0 |
|
| 136 |
+
|
| 137 |
+
The headline is not just accuracy. For this product, the most important result is zero dangerous undercalls on the final hard suite.
|
| 138 |
+
|
| 139 |
+
## Why Not Just Use a Bigger Model?
|
| 140 |
+
|
| 141 |
+
Jawbreaker is a Build Small project. A bigger model could produce richer prose, but richer prose is not the goal.
|
| 142 |
+
|
| 143 |
+
The goal is:
|
| 144 |
+
|
| 145 |
+
- narrow task
|
| 146 |
+
- readable answer
|
| 147 |
+
- structured evidence
|
| 148 |
+
- safe next action
|
| 149 |
+
- small open model
|
| 150 |
+
- no external LLM API in the scam-analysis path
|
| 151 |
+
|
| 152 |
+
The small-model path also makes the product easier to reason about. The model is doing one job, and the app has deterministic checks around it.
|
| 153 |
+
|
| 154 |
+
## What Worked
|
| 155 |
+
|
| 156 |
+
The biggest product decision was to stop treating this as "spam classification" and treat it as "family safety workflow."
|
| 157 |
+
|
| 158 |
+
Classification alone answers: "Is this spam?"
|
| 159 |
+
|
| 160 |
+
Jawbreaker answers:
|
| 161 |
+
|
| 162 |
+
- What is risky?
|
| 163 |
+
- How is the message pressuring me?
|
| 164 |
+
- What does the sender want?
|
| 165 |
+
- What should I do now?
|
| 166 |
+
- How can I ask someone I trust for help?
|
| 167 |
+
|
| 168 |
+
That shift made the UI, evals, training data, and safety guard much clearer.
|
| 169 |
+
|
| 170 |
+
## What We Would Improve Next
|
| 171 |
+
|
| 172 |
+
The next steps are practical:
|
| 173 |
+
|
| 174 |
+
- record the demo video
|
| 175 |
+
- test with more sanitized real-world examples
|
| 176 |
+
- continue mobile polish
|
| 177 |
+
- add more recent scam patterns as held-out evals before training on them
|
| 178 |
+
- improve copy quality for the trusted-person handoff
|
| 179 |
+
- publish a short model/eval walkthrough for reproducibility
|
| 180 |
+
|
| 181 |
+
We would also like to keep collecting sanitized examples from public scam alerts and user-submitted messages where private details are removed.
|
| 182 |
+
|
| 183 |
+
## Try It
|
| 184 |
+
|
| 185 |
+
Try Jawbreaker here:
|
| 186 |
+
|
| 187 |
+
https://huggingface.co/spaces/build-small-hackathon/jawbreaker
|
| 188 |
+
|
| 189 |
+
Good demo inputs:
|
| 190 |
+
|
| 191 |
+
```text
|
| 192 |
+
USPS: Your package is held due to an unpaid fee. Verify now: http://usps-track-secure.example
|
| 193 |
+
```
|
| 194 |
+
|
| 195 |
+
```text
|
| 196 |
+
Hi Grandma, I lost my phone. This is my new number. Can you send $800 for rent today? Please don't tell Mom.
|
| 197 |
+
```
|
| 198 |
+
|
| 199 |
+
```text
|
| 200 |
+
Your dentist appointment is confirmed for Tuesday at 2:00 PM. Reply C to confirm or R to reschedule.
|
| 201 |
+
```
|
| 202 |
+
|
| 203 |
+
The first two should produce scam warnings. The dentist appointment should show the false-positive boundary: not every official-looking message is dangerous, and not every short message is a scam.
|
| 204 |
+
|
| 205 |
+
## Built With
|
| 206 |
+
|
| 207 |
+
- Hugging Face Spaces
|
| 208 |
+
- Gradio / Gradio Server
|
| 209 |
+
- OpenBMB MiniCPM5-1B
|
| 210 |
+
- PEFT/LoRA
|
| 211 |
+
- Modal A100 training and eval
|
| 212 |
+
- OpenAI Codex for implementation, eval design, UI iteration, and documentation
|
| 213 |
+
|
| 214 |
+
## Links
|
| 215 |
+
|
| 216 |
+
- Space: https://huggingface.co/spaces/build-small-hackathon/jawbreaker
|
| 217 |
+
- Model: https://huggingface.co/build-small-hackathon/jawbreaker-minicpm5-1b-lora-v8
|
| 218 |
+
- Dataset/eval bundle: https://huggingface.co/datasets/build-small-hackathon/jawbreaker-scam-defense-data
|
| 219 |
+
- Collection: https://huggingface.co/collections/build-small-hackathon/jawbreaker-6a263632dcd0b6d41ca914ff
|
| 220 |
+
- GitHub: https://github.com/gowtham0992/jawbreaker
|
| 221 |
+
- Build notes: https://github.com/gowtham0992/jawbreaker/blob/main/FIELD_NOTES.md
|
| 222 |
+
- Codex evidence: https://github.com/gowtham0992/jawbreaker/blob/main/CODEX_JUDGE_EVIDENCE.md
|