SPOT: Sparse Probing and Outcome Calibration for On-Policy Distillation
Abstract
SPOT improves on-policy distillation by selectively probing uncertain positions and calibrating targets to downstream outcomes, boosting reasoning quality and coverage.
On-policy distillation (OPD) provides dense teacher supervision on student-generated trajectories, but standard reverse-KL training can assign insufficient probability to other plausible continuations. Teacher entropy alone does not reveal whether uncertainty is concentrated among a few plausible next tokens or dispersed over a long probability tail, nor whether the student already represents those candidates well. Moreover, local teacher probabilities may not predict downstream success. We introduce Sparse Probing and Outcome-calibrated Targets OPD (SPOT), which addresses two coupled decisions, where to probe and what to distill, through an acquisition--exploration--exploitation procedure. During acquisition, a position-level score combines normalized teacher entropy, the probability mass captured by a small top-k candidate set, and student--teacher mismatch to allocate a limited probing budget. During exploration, SPOT evaluates teacher-proposed candidates through verifier-scored student continuations. During exploitation, these outcomes produce a closed-form, KL-regularized target that favors candidates with better downstream outcomes while remaining anchored to the teacher distribution. Extensive experiments across multiple student models and reasoning benchmarks demonstrate the effectiveness of SPOT in improving reasoning performance while balancing solution quality and coverage.
Community
Standard OPD may under-cover plausible alternatives, while EOPD relies solely on teacher entropy and uncalibrated targets. SPOT sparsely probes informative positions and uses verifier-scored continuations to construct outcome-calibrated targets. Across three student scales, SPOT improves macro Avg@8/Pass@8 over OPD by 0.47–1.48/4.55–5.28 points and over EOPD by 0.29–0.68/2.49–3.19 points.
This is an automated message from the Librarian Bot. I found the following papers similar to this paper.
The following papers were recommended by the Semantic Scholar API
- Prefix-Guided On-Policy Distillation: Mining Golden Trajectories from Rollouts (2026)
- ReNIO: Reweighting Negative Trajectory Importance for LLM On-Policy Distillation (2026)
- Beyond the Best Teacher: Expanding and Compressing the Reasoning Solution Manifold (2026)
- Localizing Credit at the Divergence: Path-Conditioned Self-Distillation for LLM Reasoning (2026)
- Look Ahead Before You Distill: Future Trajectory Validation of Teacher Guidance for Agentic On-Policy Distillation (2026)
- DASH: Divergence-Adaptive Supervision Horizons for On-Policy Self-Distillation of Reasoning Models (2026)
- Correcting What You Cannot See: Credit Assignment for Perception Distillation in Multimodal Reasoners (2026)
Please give a thumbs up to this comment if you found it helpful!
If you want recommendations for any Paper on Hugging Face checkout this Space
You can directly ask Librarian Bot for paper recommendations by tagging it in a comment: @librarian-bot recommend
Get this paper in your agent:
hf papers read 2608.04419 Don't have the latest CLI?
curl -LsSf https://hf.co/cli/install.sh | bash Models citing this paper 0
No model linking this paper
Datasets citing this paper 0
No dataset linking this paper
Spaces citing this paper 0
No Space linking this paper