Hugging Face's logo
kanaria007's picture
1

kanaria007 PRO

kanaria007
marco45675's profile picture JanioGomes's profile picture Misa-bitlover's profile picture
·

AI & ML interests

None yet

Recent Activity

posted an update about 5 hours ago
✅ New Article: *Governing Self-Modification* Title: 🧭 Governing Self-Modification - A Charter for the Pattern-Learning Bridge 🔗 https://huggingface.co/blog/kanaria007/governing-self-modification --- Summary: “Let the system patch itself” sounds futuristic. In practice, it’s pattern mining over incidents + patch proposals + gradual drift risk. This draft is a *non-normative charter* for governing a Pattern-Learning Bridge (PLB): a subsystem that proposes (and sometimes applies) changes to policies, thresholds, and even code. > If you’re going to let a system help rewrite itself, > this is the minimum structure you owe yourself. --- Why It Matters: • Prevents *slow, invisible goal drift* from “many tiny good patches” • Blocks *governance bypass* (no self-budget edits, no weakening core constraints) • Makes change *measurable* (meta-metrics like adoption rate, rollback rate, sandbox↔prod agreement) • Defines an *emergency stop* and “rollback the PLB window” capability --- What’s Inside: • A practical threat model for self-modification (overfitting, drift, bypass, over-trust) • *Self-mod budgets*: scope × magnitude × rate, with zone ladders (auto-patch → human-gated → suggest-only) • A full governance pipeline: sensing → mining → proposal → validation → decision → deploy → retrospective • Non-negotiable *red lines* + adversarial patch detection patterns • Adoption roadmap: advisor → low-risk auto-patch → co-pilot → multi-agent → constitutional diagnostic --- 📖 Structured Intelligence Engineering Series A governance note for the moment “learning” starts touching the system itself.
published an article about 5 hours ago
Governing Self-Modification - A Charter for the Pattern-Learning Bridge
posted an update 1 day ago
✅ New Article: *Digital Constitution for SI Networks* Title: 🏛️ Digital Constitution for SI Networks - Auditable Law Above Many SI-Cores 🔗 https://huggingface.co/blog/kanaria007/digital-constitution-for-si --- *Summary:* Single-system “AI ethics” doesn’t scale. Real deployments become *networks*: many independent SI-Core instances, across orgs and jurisdictions, sharing data and making effectful decisions in the same world. This article proposes a *digital constitution layer*: a versioned, hash-chained set of *non-negotiable norms* and *minimum rights*, enforced *structurally* inside runtime gates — not as a PDF that nobody can verify. > A constitution isn’t a document. > *It’s an enforceable floor — with proofs.* --- *Why It Matters:* • Moves from “Is this system ethical?” → “What rules bind the whole network?” • Defines *hard red lines* (prohibited actions) + *soft obligations* (logging, review, transparency) • Makes compliance *auditable and replayable* (which constitution version applied, which norm fired, why) • Provides a realistic path for *multi-jurisdiction conflict handling* and constitutional amendments --- *What’s Inside:* • Three-layer model: local policy → org/sector charters → *network-level constitution* • Constitutional objects: versioned constitution IDs, scope tags, compiled norms • Runtime behavior: hard-stops, obligations, evidence trails, and “no external effect” guarantees • Amendment lifecycle: shadow-mode simulation → ratification → staged rollout → historical replay • What regulators actually see: status pages, norm-sliced metrics, incident reports, cross-border traces --- 📖 Structured Intelligence Engineering Series If SI is going to operate across cities, hospitals, grids, and nations, then governance must be *structural, measurable, and enforceable* — not rhetorical.
View all activity

Organizations

None yet